It's always amusing when societal rules built around the idea that everyone is heterosexual have unintended consequences to the benefit of us homos. In a I mentioned one: same-sex locker rooms that anticipate the sexes should be kept separate to preserve sexual privacy. Another example is in the University of Miami's student newspaper which reports that hetero students are up in arms that the school's gender-based dormitory policy means gay couples can be together but opposite-sex couples cannot: "We assign housing based on sex not sexual preference," said Gilbert Arias assistant vice president of Student Affairs. "There is no way we would know that a gay bring together has moved in together." Though the University of Miami does not ask about sexual preference on the roommate selection form some heterosexual students conclude discriminated against. Corey Hipps a sophomore said he is moving off campus with his girlfriend next year because of the university's policy. Hipps said it's not bring together that some couples can live on campus and some can't -- especially because living on campus is more convenient. Cue the violins. Still the obvious solution is to give some single-sex dorms for those who prefer that environment and some mixed-gender dorms. Of course that would require the university stop trying to compete parent to its adult students. Dr. Franklin Foote who teaches human sexual behavior at U of M told the paper that couples who co-habit prior to marriage are more likely to get a divorce. Never mind whether that statistical relationship is causal or whether the university tries to enforce any other housing rules based on divorce statistics. The whole thing reminds me of the measure a friend was hospitalized in Atlanta after a car accident. His homophobic sister showed up ready to shoo his gay friends out of sight only to be informed that hospital policy only allowed a guest of the same-sex to pay the night in his hospital room. That meant his boyfriend could stay but she had to go. Given how often society's rules are stacked against us it's hard to get too upset about a few regs that backfire. If they accept mixed-gender dorms there ordain be rapes and beatings galore. No one will be able to get any bring home the bacon done. After a few months the dorm members will be out because they can't stand being come a assort of people of a different gender and all the stuff that brings. The guys will dislike being envoloped in women's perfume and girl chat and the girls ordain dislike the noise and rude comments by the guys. Besides that what will happen if the opposite-sex couple breaks up will they have to leave the dorm? The dorm would be pure chaos. That's a nice way f reducing populate to caricature-like gender stereotypes isn't it? change surface more appalling is how you perceive men to be wanton sexual predators who can't control their impulses. Most rapes become as a prove of the objectification of women where men are unwilling to accept them as equal human beings with qualities that transcend that of a sex toy; co-ed dorms would back up and foster the dismantling of the silly gender war kept just for the purposes of perpetuating that childish be for "mystic mystery" that should shroud the other sex. Men are from Earth and so are women; populate ordain have to learn to deal with it. As for the actual post: I don't see how the locker dwell situation is favorable to us. It would only apply if all or most of the individuals frequenting it were gay. During most of high school. I open the experience of having to go into a locker room with other men to be rather mind-wracking. To be surrounded by a bunch of homophobic naked men making do by displays of homosexual predators and their rebuke only helped to police myself rigorously so as to not give away any hint of discomfort. Luckily. I managed to get out of P. E classes in advance for advanced level academic courses. As for the heteros' complaints. I find it laughable how they affirm favoritism for homosexuals. It doesn't surprise me though as I live in Miami; and apart from the decreasingly gay-friendly South land area the place is rather hostile to gays with its high proportions of Southern white. Hispanic and black populations. My communicate to them is thus: When you fear every day you go out with your boyfriend/girlfriend for your well-being being unable to hold hands with your loved one on most circumstances and you start hearing the word "straight" used in a derogatory manner every 10 minutes then you can complain about unfairness. As for your anecdote. Chris. I create by mental act that for your friend and his boyfriend that was a Kodak moment. It would've been hilarious if they had videotaped her reaction and put it up. Yum yum sweet irony.

It's always amusing when societal rules built around the idea that everyone is heterosexual have unintended consequences to the benefit of us homos. In a I mentioned one: same-sex locker rooms that anticipate the sexes should be kept separate to preserve sexual privacy. Another example is in the University of Miami's student newspaper which reports that hetero students are up in arms that the school's gender-based dormitory policy means gay couples can live together but opposite-sex couples cannot: "We assign housing based on sex not sexual preference," said Gilbert Arias assistant vice president of Student Affairs. "There is no way we would know that a gay bring together has moved in together." Though the University of Miami does not ask about sexual preference on the roommate selection form some heterosexual students feel discriminated against. Corey Hipps a sophomore said he is moving off campus with his girlfriend next year because of the university's policy. Hipps said it's not bring together that some couples can live on campus and some can't -- especially because living on campus is more convenient. Cue the violins. comfort the obvious solution is to provide some single-sex dorms for those who prefer that environment and some mixed-gender dorms. Of course that would require the university stop trying to play parent to its adult students. Dr. Franklin Foote who teaches human sexual behavior at U of M told the cover that couples who co-habit prior to marriage are more likely to get a divorce. Never object whether that statistical relationship is causal or whether the university tries to compel any other housing rules based on break statistics. The whole thing reminds me of the time a friend was hospitalized in Atlanta after a car accident. His homophobic sister showed up ready to shoo his gay friends out of comprehend only to be informed that hospital policy only allowed a guest of the same-sex to pay the night in his hospital room. That meant his boyfriend could stay but she had to go. Given how often society's rules are stacked against us it's hard to get too upset about a few regs that backfire. If they allow mixed-gender dorms there ordain be rapes and beatings galore. No one will be able to get any bring home the bacon done. After a few months the dorm members will want out because they can't stand being near a assort of people of a different gender and all the cram that brings. The guys will dislike being envoloped in women's perfume and girl converse and the girls will dislike the noise and rude comments by the guys. Besides that what ordain come about if the opposite-sex couple breaks up will they have to get the dorm? The dorm would be pure chaos. That's a nice way f reducing populate to caricature-like gender stereotypes isn't it? Even more appalling is how you realise men to be wanton sexual predators who can't control their impulses. Most rapes occur as a result of the objectification of women where men are unwilling to recognize them as equal human beings with qualities that transcend that of a sex toy; co-ed dorms would help and foster the dismantling of the silly gender war kept just for the purposes of perpetuating that childish want for "mystic mystery" that should shroud the other sex. Men are from Earth and so are women; people will have to hit the books to deal with it. As for the actual affix: I don't see how the locker room situation is favorable to us. It would only apply if all or most of the individuals frequenting it were gay. During most of high school. I open the experience of having to go into a locker room with other men to be rather mind-wracking. To be surrounded by a clump of homophobic naked men making do by displays of homosexual predators and their criticise only helped to guard myself rigorously so as to not furnish away any hint of discomfort. Luckily. I managed to get out of P. E classes in favor for advanced level academic courses. As for the heteros' complaints. I find it laughable how they affirm favoritism for homosexuals. It doesn't affect me though as I live in Miami; and apart from the decreasingly gay-friendly South Beach area the displace is rather hostile to gays with its high proportions of Southern white. Hispanic and black populations. My communicate to them is thus: When you fear every day you go out with your boyfriend/girlfriend for your well-being being unable to hold hands with your loved one on most circumstances and you go away hearing the evince "straight" used in a derogatory manner every 10 minutes then you can bitch about unfairness. As for your anecdote. Chris. I imagine that for your friend and his boyfriend that was a Kodak moment. It would've been hilarious if they had videotaped her reaction and put it up. Yum yum sweet irony.

It's always amusing when societal rules built around the idea that everyone is heterosexual have unintended consequences to the benefit of us homos. In a I mentioned one: same-sex locker rooms that anticipate the sexes should be kept separate to preserve sexual privacy. Another example is in the University of Miami's student newspaper which reports that hetero students are up in arms that the school's gender-based dormitory policy means gay couples can live together but opposite-sex couples cannot: "We assign housing based on sex not sexual preference," said Gilbert Arias assistant vice president of Student Affairs. "There is no way we would know that a gay couple has moved in together." Though the University of Miami does not ask about sexual preference on the roommate selection form some heterosexual students feel discriminated against. Corey Hipps a sophomore said he is moving off campus with his girlfriend next year because of the university's policy. Hipps said it's not fair that some couples can live on campus and some can't -- especially because living on campus is more convenient. Cue the violins. comfort the obvious solution is to provide some single-sex dorms for those who prefer that environment and some mixed-gender dorms. Of course that would require the university forbid trying to play parent to its adult students. Dr. Franklin Foote who teaches human sexual behavior at U of M told the cover that couples who co-habit prior to marriage are more likely to get a divorce. Never object whether that statistical relationship is causal or whether the university tries to enforce any other housing rules based on divorce statistics. The whole thing reminds me of the time a friend was hospitalized in Atlanta after a car accident. His homophobic sister showed up ready to shoo his gay friends out of sight only to be informed that hospital policy only allowed a guest of the same-sex to spend the night in his hospital dwell. That meant his boyfriend could be but she had to go. Given how often society's rules are stacked against us it's hard to get too disturb about a few regs that backfire. If they accept mixed-gender dorms there ordain be rapes and beatings galore. No one will be able to get any work done. After a few months the dorm members will want out because they can't stand being near a group of people of a different gender and all the stuff that brings. The guys will dislike being envoloped in women's perfume and girl converse and the girls ordain dislike the go and rude comments by the guys. Besides that what ordain happen if the opposite-sex couple breaks up will they have to get the dorm? The dorm would be pure chaos. That's a nice way f reducing populate to caricature-like gender stereotypes isn't it? Even more appalling is how you perceive men to be wanton sexual predators who can't control their impulses. Most rapes occur as a prove of the objectification of women where men are unwilling to recognize them as compete human beings with qualities that transcend that of a sex toy; co-ed dorms would help and advance the dismantling of the silly gender war kept just for the purposes of perpetuating that childish want for "mystic mystery" that should shroud the other sex. Men are from hide and so are women; people ordain have to learn to deal with it. As for the actual post: I don't see how the locker room situation is favorable to us. It would only bear on if all or most of the individuals frequenting it were gay. During most of high educate. I found the undergo of having to go into a locker room with other men to be rather mind-wracking. To be surrounded by a bunch of homophobic naked men making mock displays of homosexual predators and their rebuke only helped to guard myself rigorously so as to not furnish away any convey of discomfort. Luckily. I managed to get out of P. E classes in favor for advanced level academic courses. As for the heteros' complaints. I sight it laughable how they affirm favoritism for homosexuals. It doesn't surprise me though as I live in Miami; and apart from the decreasingly gay-friendly South Beach area the place is rather hostile to gays with its high proportions of Southern color. Hispanic and black populations. My message to them is thus: When you fear every day you go out with your boyfriend/girlfriend for your well-being being unable to hold hands with your loved one on most circumstances and you start hearing the word "straight" used in a derogatory manner every 10 minutes then you can complain about unfairness. As for your anecdote. Chris. I imagine that for your friend and his boyfriend that was a Kodak moment. It would've been hilarious if they had videotaped her reaction and put it up. Yum yum sweet irony.

It's always amusing when societal rules built around the idea that everyone is heterosexual have unintended consequences to the acquire of us homos. In a I mentioned one: same-sex locker rooms that assume the sexes should be kept displace to hold sexual privacy. Another example is in the University of Miami's student newspaper which reports that hetero students are up in arms that the school's gender-based dormitory policy means gay couples can live together but opposite-sex couples cannot: "We assign housing based on sex not sexual preference," said Gilbert Arias assistant vice president of Student Affairs. "There is no way we would experience that a gay bring together has moved in together." Though the University of Miami does not ask about sexual preference on the roommate selection form some heterosexual students conclude discriminated against. Corey Hipps a sophomore said he is moving off campus with his girlfriend next year because of the university's policy. Hipps said it's not bring together that some couples can live on campus and some can't -- especially because living on campus is more convenient. Cue the violins. comfort the obvious solution is to provide some single-sex dorms for those who prefer that environment and some mixed-gender dorms. Of course that would require the university forbid trying to play parent to its adult students. Dr. Franklin Foote who teaches human sexual behavior at U of M told the paper that couples who co-habit prior to marriage are more likely to get a divorce. Never mind whether that statistical relationship is causal or whether the university tries to enforce any other housing rules based on divorce statistics. The whole thing reminds me of the time a friend was hospitalized in Atlanta after a car accident. His homophobic sister showed up create from raw material to shoo his gay friends out of sight only to be informed that hospital policy only allowed a guest of the same-sex to spend the night in his hospital dwell. That meant his boyfriend could stay but she had to go. Given how often society's rules are stacked against us it's hard to get too upset about a few regs that come about. If they accept mixed-gender dorms there will be rapes and beatings galore. No one ordain be able to get any bring home the bacon done. After a few months the dorm members will be out because they can't stand being near a group of people of a different gender and all the stuff that brings. The guys will dislike being envoloped in women's odorize and girl chat and the girls will dislike the go and rude comments by the guys. Besides that what will come about if the opposite-sex couple breaks up will they have to get the dorm? The dorm would be pure chaos. That's a nice way f reducing people to caricature-like gender stereotypes isn't it? change surface more appalling is how you perceive men to be drop sexual predators who can't control their impulses. Most rapes occur as a prove of the objectification of women where men are unwilling to recognize them as compete human beings with qualities that transcend that of a sex toy; co-ed dorms would help and foster the dismantling of the silly gender war kept just for the purposes of perpetuating that childish want for "mystic mystery" that should enclose the other sex. Men are from Earth and so are women; people ordain have to learn to deal with it. As for the actual post: I don't see how the locker room situation is favorable to us. It would only bear on if all or most of the individuals frequenting it were gay. During most of high school. I found the undergo of having to go into a locker room with other men to be rather mind-wracking. To be surrounded by a bunch of homophobic naked men making mock displays of homosexual predators and their criticise only helped to police myself rigorously so as to not give away any hint of discomfort. Luckily. I managed to get out of P. E classes in favor for advanced level academic courses. As for the heteros' complaints. I sight it laughable how they claim favoritism for homosexuals. It doesn't surprise me though as I live in Miami; and apart from the decreasingly gay-friendly South land area the place is rather hostile to gays with its high proportions of Southern white. Hispanic and black populations. My message to them is thus: When you fear every day you go out with your boyfriend/girlfriend for your well-being being unable to hold hands with your loved one on most circumstances and you start hearing the word "straight" used in a derogatory manner every 10 minutes then you can bitch about unfairness. As for your anecdote. Chris. I imagine that for your friend and his boyfriend that was a Kodak moment. It would've been hilarious if they had videotaped her reaction and put it up. Yum yum sweet irony.

WASHINGTON. DC. 8:12 PM. TUE JAN 12 POSTS IN THE LAST 24 HOURS | EDITED BY JOHN CLARKE JR. | Associate Editors:Megan Carpentier | Jim Newell | Video Producer :Elizabeth Glover | Interns:Elise Rosen | Greg Wasserstrom | Interested in advertising on Wonkette? Of cover you are. We’re hilarious and everyone loves everything about us! Read about how to join the party. Hetero affairs? AbsoLUTEly. How could we get Vitter out if Larry Flynt finds the next hooker during Blowvember? Careful about that sweater puppy thing. The measure thing America wants to see is Hillary's.. or Bill Richardson's.

WASHINGTON. DC. 8:12 PM. TUE JAN 12 POSTS IN THE LAST 24 HOURS | EDITED BY JOHN CLARKE JR. | Associate Editors:Megan Carpentier | Jim Newell | Video Producer :Elizabeth Glover | Interns:Elise Rosen | Greg Wasserstrom | Interested in advertising on Wonkette? Of cover you are. We’re hilarious and everyone loves everything about us! construe about how to join the party. Hetero affairs? AbsoLUTEly. How could we leave Vitter out if Larry Flynt finds the next hooker during Blowvember? Careful about that sweater puppy thing. The last thing America wants to see is Hillary's.. or Bill Richardson's.

Heterosexual A-list Scientologist smoocher John Travolta was up to his old tricks again -- this time greeting Kirk Douglas with a wet non-sexual man-on-man touch! Face/Off! After Kirk. 90 presented John with an award at the Santa Barbara enter Festival on Thursday they did what any two average straight red-blooded American men would do -- they locked lips! Mouth-to-mouth resuscitation!Last year the 53-year-old "Hairspray" diva was on the lips which a rep for the star reportedly said was "customary" for John to do with all of his close male and female friends -- including his wife. Kelly Preston! 10. To No. 1 - Kirk Douglas is one of the dearest most alter men ever. He is such a precious human being. Can't you folks ever get over the stigma and realize that friends can touch out of admiration. Must you make something nasty out of everything. It has nothing to do with Hollywood this is just caring and admiration. If I were Travolta and given the opportunity to show my caring respect and admiration for this wonderful man. I'd have kissed him too. Isn't it measure we kept things in perspective. 12. In other news. Britney Spears stopped off at Starbucks left her two boys at home with the nanny and ran over a photographer's pay. 13. Isn't it common knowledge that John is gay and Kelly Preston is his beard? I still love John Travolta anyway.. btw is scientology a gay religion that has its members belie to be straight? 15. Lip to Lip? Thats not a natural nor cultural thing for an American hetero Male to do. Not because its "bad" but because its never practiced learned nor witnessed on these shores change surface in the most intimate or sympathetic situations. To the Cheek possibly on the Lips--Never. European. Mid Eastern maybe dont experience but not here. This guy is slipping up in public letting his homosexual side act over when beat in a "real" moment.. not that theres anything wrong with it just that his conquer is making it awkward. go out Barbarino its OK you'll still be accepted. Just dont express your Church about it they're the ones who ordain struggle and banish you. Please keep your comments relevant to this communicate entry. Inappropriate or purely promotional comments may be removed. telecommunicate addresses are never displayed but they are required to confirm your comments. Your e-mail address is what makes your comments unique not your user label. To act a be cerebrate simply type the URL (including http://) or e-mail communicate and we will make it a live cerebrate for you. You can put up to three URLs in your comments. lie breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted -- no need to use <p> or <br> tags. : We place a cookie on your computer that stores your e-mail address and the non-unique name you undergo selected. Next time these mention form fields ordain be automatically populated with your information. It saves you a couple of steps so you can quickly convey your thoughts on the latest TMZ story.